🔗 Share this article

Some battle royale players are feeling let down, and this isn't because of the latest virtual happenings. Fortnite's current mini-season, which introduces a Simpsons-themed world, also rolled out a fresh mechanic known as sidekicks. There's no ignore that the new companions are adorable. However, the associated prices have left numerous fans stunned at the developer's attempts to monetize almost each part of the gaming experience.

Understanding Sidekicks?

Companions are basically similar to Pokémon, though having some limitations. You can give them a name, and they will follow you during a game. They are immortal, and you can interact with them. Other players not in your party cannot view sidekicks — and showing off one's companions is arguably half the fun of owning them. Sidekicks are able to be outfitted with costumes and gestures, but the debate revolves around their appearance. A pet's overall design can only be altered one time, after which that choice is permanent. Players can choose a sidekick's coat color, accent hues, eye colors, pattern, and their build size.

The Expensive Customization System

Should a player afterward choose that you want your pet to appear slightly different, it's not possible to simply further modify the look. Players must purchase a new companion. Furthermore, sidekicks aren't inexpensive. The majority of people are obtaining the banana-themed sidekick, because it's packaged in the current battle pass. Based on leaks, upcoming pets may be priced at from 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; for reference, 1,000 V-Bucks is priced at $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks cost $22.99. However, players can rename a sidekick as many times as they want.

Player Response and Parallels

The majority of pets have not been formally released yet, so the cost may easily change. Yet regardless of whether the company makes sidekicks more affordable, a lot of the anger stems from the reality that players might need to spend for a one type of sidekick more than once. To certain players, the cost structure feels particularly egregious considering the developer has already introduced companions that are carried around as part of back blings. Backpack pets do not have a restriction on changes and are visible by other participants in the match. Backpack buddies can't be named or use gestures, but opposing players can occasionally interact with them — and this is more favorable than being invisible altogether.

Lack of unique functions and limited engagement options have numerous players experiencing disappointed. Why can't you, for example, play fetch with your stylish fruit-themed pet? Some note that companions sometimes fail to stay close with the user if a game is moving quickly, or mention that the banana pet occupies two spots in the reward system — which reinforces the notion that the developer is squeezing players for money. Greedy is a word that's coming up often in such conversations, with a number of comparing sidekick pricing to similar intense pricing schemes in titles like popular sports games. Additionally, it doesn't help that some sidekicks are projected to be pricier than their character skin counterparts.

"We urge you to do not purchasing Sidekicks," urges one highly-voted online thread that encourages other gamers to proverbially express disapproval by not spending.

"I know they're adorable," the post continues, "we realize they're enjoyable. I know everyone has been anticipating them. But the monetization focus being shown is disgusting and must not be supported."

The Broader Context of Virtual Spending

In recent years, Fortnite's events and collaborations have grown in scale and aspiration, but the free-to-play title still needs to generate revenue. As such, the sheer number of cosmetics users are able to currently purchase has grown almost excessive. In addition to standard items like back blings, gliders, harvesting tools, and gestures, players might potentially spend money on shoes, music tracks, musical tools, building blocks, cars, tires, custom paint jobs, seasonal rewards, and a membership. Companion pets do not just require money, but also bring in a range of new revenue options for the developer. Presumably, users will before long be able to spend for things like pet appearances, costumes, gestures, and further engagement features.

Every one of such customization items are completely voluntary and not necessary to enjoy the experience, yet equipment can still influence a player's social experience. Younger players, for example, sometimes encounter teasing for not wearing impressive enough skins. A comparable situation previously occurred when the developer launched brand-name shoes, which may be priced from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. The shoe cost model was not popular as well, and some players promised that they'd avoid succumb to the pressure at the time. However ultimately, purchasing footwear became normalized. Today, sidekicks are further testing the limits of how much a player could be willing to pay to stand out within the crowd.

What's Ahead for Companion Pets?

Pets are still a relatively recent feature, and they exist a title that updates regularly. A few fans are sharing that they have received a survey that assesses how people think about sidekick functionality and monetization, which could potentially indicate that the developer's strategy are still subject to change. But if Fortnite footwear are a sign, companions likely will not get more affordable in general — there will just be a broader selection of costs to shop.

Ultimately, where certain individuals are raging at the game item costs, different players are experiencing nothing but happiness for their new competitive friends.