🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are increasingly enabling the far right to set the public discourse, as per a recent research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Researchers discovered that this trend has inadvertently helped radical parties by legitimising their viewpoints and spreading them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The findings, published in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 articles from six national publications.

Capital-based researchers noted that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the late 1990s to core subjects like integration and migration, established parties progressively adjusted their communication in reaction.

This adaptation amplified the spread of these concepts and signaled to voters that such stances were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Political communication by established parties plays a central role in the voting performance of the far right," stated a political sociologist participating in the study.

"This factor has been underestimated," she added.

The effect was evident even when mainstream parties were criticising the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is crucial."

Normalisation Effect Across the Continent

While the research was focused on the German context, this normalisation effect is probable to affect nations across the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in German and British media," explained another co-author. "The far right makes a statement and everybody begins discussing it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Hardening of Public Rhetoric

At times, leaders have also hardened their discourse to match that of the far right.

In a recently published discussion, a former German chancellor called for large-scale deportations and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar instances can be observed throughout Europe, as elected officials from countries ranging from the United Kingdom to France adopt the rhetoric of the radical right, particularly on immigration.

This has created an echo chamber that was inconceivable a ten years prior.

Core Problem: Who Sets the Narrative?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are talking about cultural issues – migration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the radical right, that's the essence of narrative control," explained a researcher.

Other parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the hardline agenda of the radical right, despite research indicates that this approach leads voters to vote for the radical faction.

Gradual Influence and Public Perception

The extent of data collected revealed that the impact of radical parties had been gradual and had increased with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," commented a co-author. "However, when you encounter this pessimistic narrative around immigration every second week, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this narrative travels further."

Need for Established Groups to Develop Their Own Narratives

The study highlighted the need for established parties to develop their own discourses, especially on topics such as immigration and integration, instead of constantly trailing after the far right.

"It's like a dance," explained one author. "If the conductor is radical and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."