🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard women from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked widespread outcry both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly send back the legislation for additional review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple European countries
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect comparable debates in other member states